Mercedes is preparing a major change: EQE and EQE SUV will be phased out by 2026. This decision shortens the lifecycle of two of the brand’s newest EVs and makes room for an electric lineup with less overlap, more focus, and a classic three-box design.
Why will Mercedes end EQE and EQE SUV by 2026?
The brand reevaluated its electric portfolio, reducing redundancies between sedans and SUVs, and decided to focus on established names (E‑Class, C‑Class, GLC) in EV versions. In addition to repositioning, the commercial performance of the EQE did not support a long cycle, especially in AMG variants with range below expectations for the premium segment.
Another point: the “one-bow” (more rounded and aerodynamic) design language is giving way to a three-box “limousine” style. This enhances perceived status in global markets and makes it easier to transition to successors with a clearer positioning and greater range per charge.
What’s coming next: C‑Class EV, GLC EV, and a true E‑Class EV?
The plan is to replace the EQEs indirectly with the C‑Class EV and GLC EV, while a successor to the E‑Class EV, in spirit, should adopt classic proportions, a “status-oriented” wheelbase, and more efficient technical package. The rebirth of the “three-box” electric sedan promises improvements in ergonomics, trunk space, and aerodynamic noise.
At the mid-size sedan level, the new electric CLA has already been hinted as a much more mature entry point, and you can follow the project details here: Mercedes launches CLA 2026 EV.
Is it still worth buying an EQE/EQE SUV now? Price, versions, and range
If the right price appears, yes. The EQE started at around $64,950 and can go up to $96,600 in AMG versions. The EQE SUV had a starting price of $64,950, with AMG configurations around $97,400. In AMG variants, typical range is about 220 to 230 miles (354–370 km), reflecting a focus on performance. On the other hand, the package is solid: EVA2 platform (400V), roughly 90 kWh battery, peak DC fast charging near 170 kW, optional air suspension, and rear steering.
Looking for a Mercedes electric with a more practical urban use approach and cost balance? Check out the full review of this sibling model, which remains relevant: Mercedes EQB 250+.
What lessons does this decision reveal about the brand’s electric strategy?
First, strong names sell: repositioning EVs under the E‑Class, C‑Class, and GLC families simplifies communication, residual value, and global perception. Second, reducing overlap decreases industrial complexity and accelerates margins. Third, autonomy and efficiency will be key priorities — especially in high-performance variants that need to deliver more competitive numbers without sacrificing range.
Mercedes is also testing new solutions to gain minor efficiency improvements. Follow one of these promising ideas in testing — promising in theory and interesting in real-world application: solar paint on electric cars.
What improvements can be expected in future models in design, dynamics, and efficiency?
Expect a true E‑Class EV with “3-box design”, better visibility, a useful trunk, and refined acoustics. Technically, look for more compact and efficient motors, higher-density power inverters, battery packs with optimized chemistry, and smarter thermal management software. These changes should increase real-world range, especially on highways, and reduce consumption in cold weather.
In terms of performance, Mercedes has already demonstrated mastery of high-performance electric architecture; an insightful example is this concept hinting at AMG’s future direction as EVs: AMG GT XX Concept EV.
Summary in 30 seconds
- EQE/EQE SUV phased out by 2026
- Less overlap, more focus
- New E‑Class EV with 3‑box design
- Prices: $64,950 to $97,400
- AMG: 220–230 miles (354–370 km) range
- EVA2 platform, DC ~170 kW, luxury and tech
Direct competitors: quick comparison
- Audi A6 e-tron: focus on range
- BMW i5: dynamics and cockpit
- Tesla Model S: charging and network
- Porsche Taycan: sporty handling
- Lucid Air: efficiency and space
How will the transition unfold: hybrids, software, and naming help?
The short-term strategy involves powerful hybrids, improved onboard electric architecture, more predictable assistants, and simplified naming — all aimed at reducing friction for customers transitioning from ICE to EV. The goal is to deliver performance with efficiency — without “range anxiety” or charging headaches.
An example of this “technological step-up” is the high-performance hybrid E‑Class lineup, which hints at the balance expected in subsequent pure EVs: Mercedes‑AMG E53 HYBRID.
Compared to rivals, where does Mercedes need to improve now?
Real range on highways, fast charging capability (charging curve), thermal efficiency, and overall weight. The EQE’s dynamic package is convincing, but future models need to match or surpass the segment benchmarks in range and consumption.
In terms of range and efficiency, looking at competitors helps set expectations — especially with new platforms focused on range, such as the Audi A6/S6 e-tron.
FAQ — Quick questions
- When will production of EQE and EQE SUV end? By 2026, gradually phased out as stocks and markets allow.
- Who will replace the EQE? Indirectly, the C‑Class EV/GLC EV; directly, a future three-box E‑Class EV.
- What is the current price range? Between $64,950 and approximately $97,400, depending on version and features.
- Are AMG versions worth it? They deliver performance, but range (about 220–230 miles / 354–370 km) is a key consideration.
- Basic specs? EVA2 platform, ~90 kWh, DC ~170 kW, air suspension, optional rear steering.
What would you do if you were Mercedes: keep the EQE or switch directly to a three-box E‑Class EV? Leave a comment below and join the discussion.
Author: Fabio Isidoro
Founder and editor-in-chief of Canal Carro, he dedicates himself to exploring the automotive universe with depth and passion. A car and technology enthusiast, he produces technical content and in-depth analyses of national and international vehicles, combining quality information with a critical eye for the public.